<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flourishing People &#187; Lencioni</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/index.php/tag/lencioni/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>People Management Advice and Support: comment from Peter Kenworthy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:44:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Functioning Teams</title>
		<link>http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/05/functioning-teams/</link>
		<comments>http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/05/functioning-teams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 08:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lencioni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team-building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[team-work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Effective team-working is one of 3D HR&#8217;s dimensions &#8211; the other two being good people management and developing personal skills.  These three areas create a strong foundation for a successful organisation which we visualise as a tetrahedron.  Interestingly I&#8217;ve just come across Tetramap as a concept of discussing and appreciating difference between individuals in how we deal with the world &#8211; but more of that after my accreditation training in July&#8230;</p>
<p>What makes a good team?  What are the defining characteristics that you can identify in an effective team?  During my work experience I have been part of some great teams and some poor ones &#8211; what made the difference?</p>
<p>In a recent conference I was introduced to the book &#8216;The Five Dysfunctions of a Team&#8217; by Patrick Lencioni.   Since then I&#8217;ve bought the book and read the Field Guide.   I think it&#8217;s well worth sharing and encouraging others to read this &#8216;leadership fable&#8217;.</p>
<p>A team must first be built on a foundation of trust &#8211; a willingness to be vulnerable with one another and admit mistakes and weaknesses.  Secondly, constructive conflict should not only be allowed but also encouraged &#8211; fear of conflict leads to avoidance of those &#8216;difficult&#8217; discussions and making hard decisions. Commitment or buy-in follows trust and not avoiding conflict, because team members are able and willing to fully endorse team decisions even if contrary to their initial reservations.</p>
<p>Effective teams hold each other to account and are prepared to challenge each other if necessary when a team member does not deliver what&#8217;s required.  Lastly, at the top of the pyramid, functioning teams pay attention to collective results rather than individual needs.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-137 aligncenter" title="team-dysfunctions" src="http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/team-dysfunctions-282x300.png" alt="team-dysfunctions" width="282" height="300" />Lencioni presents the concept as a negative model &#8211; in terms of dysfunctions &#8211; probably because it&#8217;s easier to describe how a non-functioning team can improve.  The best of teams can still improve and function better by paying attention to these critical issues.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Presented as a five-step pyramid, the Five Dysfunctions look simple and common sense.  Yet there is much to commend when a model can be so easily described even if a lot harder to implement.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Happy team-building!  The book is in the <a href="http://hr-adviser.co.uk/Bookstore.html" target="_blank">3D HR Book Store</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Note: There is a print link embedded within this post, please visit this post to print it.</p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Effective team-working is one of 3D HR&#8217;s dimensions &#8211; the other two being good people management and developing personal skills.  These three areas create a strong foundation for a successful organisation which we visualise as a tetrahedron.  Interestingly I&#8217;ve just come across Tetramap as a concept of discussing and appreciating difference between individuals in how we deal with the world &#8211; but more of that after my accreditation training in July&#8230;</p>
<p>What makes a good team?  What are the defining characteristics that you can identify in an effective team?  During my work experience I have been part of some great teams and some poor ones &#8211; what made the difference?</p>
<p>In a recent conference I was introduced to the book &#8216;The Five Dysfunctions of a Team&#8217; by Patrick Lencioni.   Since then I&#8217;ve bought the book and read the Field Guide.   I think it&#8217;s well worth sharing and encouraging others to read this &#8216;leadership fable&#8217;.</p>
<p>A team must first be built on a foundation of trust &#8211; a willingness to be vulnerable with one another and admit mistakes and weaknesses.  Secondly, constructive conflict should not only be allowed but also encouraged &#8211; fear of conflict leads to avoidance of those &#8216;difficult&#8217; discussions and making hard decisions. Commitment or buy-in follows trust and not avoiding conflict, because team members are able and willing to fully endorse team decisions even if contrary to their initial reservations.</p>
<p>Effective teams hold each other to account and are prepared to challenge each other if necessary when a team member does not deliver what&#8217;s required.  Lastly, at the top of the pyramid, functioning teams pay attention to collective results rather than individual needs.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="size-medium wp-image-137 aligncenter" title="team-dysfunctions" src="http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/team-dysfunctions-282x300.png" alt="team-dysfunctions" width="282" height="300" />Lencioni presents the concept as a negative model &#8211; in terms of dysfunctions &#8211; probably because it&#8217;s easier to describe how a non-functioning team can improve.  The best of teams can still improve and function better by paying attention to these critical issues.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Presented as a five-step pyramid, the Five Dysfunctions look simple and common sense.  Yet there is much to commend when a model can be so easily described even if a lot harder to implement.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Happy team-building!  The book is in the <a href="http://hr-adviser.co.uk/Bookstore.html" target="_blank">3D HR Book Store</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Note: There is a print link embedded within this post, please visit this post to print it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/05/functioning-teams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

