<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flourishing People &#187; listening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/index.php/tag/listening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>People Management Advice and Support: comment from Peter Kenworthy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:44:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How are they doing?</title>
		<link>http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/10/how-are-they-doing/</link>
		<comments>http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/10/how-are-they-doing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appraisal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Arts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Organisations need to know how their people are performing.  Are they meeting targets set and reaching the performance standards required?  Most organisations use some form of appraisal process but I wonder how many of those processes really work and deliver the information required?</p>
<p>In previous organisations I have used the Video Arts material, especially &#8216;The Dreaded Appraisal&#8217;.  Using comedy drama, the key skills of active listening, constructive feedback and structured conversations are brought into focus.  In the film, examples of really bad practice are contrasted with good use of these people management skills.</p>
<p>So often the appraisal process is treated as a chore to keep the HR Department happy (or at least off our backs) &#8211; a form filling exercise that at best achieves very little and at worst creates animosity between manager and staff that prevails for the rest of the year.  How can it add real value to the organisation and to people&#8217;s working lives?</p>
<p>The first step is to prepare for the appraisal interview.  Ensure the time is adequate (I reckon on two hours) and in diaries in plenty of time.  Both appraiser and appraisee need to make time to review the past with as much if not more emphasis on what went well as what went badly.  Rather than a mutual rebuking session, an appraisal interview needs to include praise and celebration.  That is not to disregard problems and mistakes &#8211; on either side &#8211; but rather to keep them in context and hopefully learn from them.  A more recent Video Arts production &#8216;How am I doing?&#8217; compares the appraisal process to a doctor&#8217;s consultation and review of case history.</p>
<p>Secondly, managers need to use their skills of active listening, using a variety of types of questions &#8211; more open and probing than closed.  A listening environment requires uninterrupted space and time without distractions of mobile phones, etc.   The appraisee is more likely to self-appraise and come up with their own solutions to issues if given the opportunity and time to think.</p>
<p>Thirdly, having reviewed the past, the appraisal interview is the appropriate time to plan for the future.  This is best considered from the twin angles of work plans and personal development plans.  A wide variety of possible learning and development interventions need to be discussed, rather than assume formal training courses are always the answer.  SMART objectives which are specific, measurable, agreed, realistic and with time-lines are much better than vague aims or targets which may or may not be met.</p>
<p>The best people managers use appraisal interviews not just to assess their team members&#8217; performance but also their own performance as team leaders.  Not so much &#8216;how are they doing?&#8217; as &#8216;how are we doing (together)?&#8217;</p>
Note: There is a print link embedded within this post, please visit this post to print it.
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organisations need to know how their people are performing.  Are they meeting targets set and reaching the performance standards required?  Most organisations use some form of appraisal process but I wonder how many of those processes really work and deliver the information required?</p>
<p>In previous organisations I have used the Video Arts material, especially &#8216;The Dreaded Appraisal&#8217;.  Using comedy drama, the key skills of active listening, constructive feedback and structured conversations are brought into focus.  In the film, examples of really bad practice are contrasted with good use of these people management skills.</p>
<p>So often the appraisal process is treated as a chore to keep the HR Department happy (or at least off our backs) &#8211; a form filling exercise that at best achieves very little and at worst creates animosity between manager and staff that prevails for the rest of the year.  How can it add real value to the organisation and to people&#8217;s working lives?</p>
<p>The first step is to prepare for the appraisal interview.  Ensure the time is adequate (I reckon on two hours) and in diaries in plenty of time.  Both appraiser and appraisee need to make time to review the past with as much if not more emphasis on what went well as what went badly.  Rather than a mutual rebuking session, an appraisal interview needs to include praise and celebration.  That is not to disregard problems and mistakes &#8211; on either side &#8211; but rather to keep them in context and hopefully learn from them.  A more recent Video Arts production &#8216;How am I doing?&#8217; compares the appraisal process to a doctor&#8217;s consultation and review of case history.</p>
<p>Secondly, managers need to use their skills of active listening, using a variety of types of questions &#8211; more open and probing than closed.  A listening environment requires uninterrupted space and time without distractions of mobile phones, etc.   The appraisee is more likely to self-appraise and come up with their own solutions to issues if given the opportunity and time to think.</p>
<p>Thirdly, having reviewed the past, the appraisal interview is the appropriate time to plan for the future.  This is best considered from the twin angles of work plans and personal development plans.  A wide variety of possible learning and development interventions need to be discussed, rather than assume formal training courses are always the answer.  SMART objectives which are specific, measurable, agreed, realistic and with time-lines are much better than vague aims or targets which may or may not be met.</p>
<p>The best people managers use appraisal interviews not just to assess their team members&#8217; performance but also their own performance as team leaders.  Not so much &#8216;how are they doing?&#8217; as &#8216;how are we doing (together)?&#8217;</p>
Note: There is a print link embedded within this post, please visit this post to print it.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hr-adviser.co.uk/blog/index.php/2009/10/how-are-they-doing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

